OCP EMEA Summit
Data-center integration of quantum infrastructure is accelerating. This upcoming OCP EMEA session focuses on practical QPU integration patterns. More details will be added as materials are finalized.
Interested in inviting me to speak? Send me an email.
Data-center integration of quantum infrastructure is accelerating. This upcoming OCP EMEA session focuses on practical QPU integration patterns. More details will be added as materials are finalized.
Quantum-HPC middleware bottlenecks are mostly operational. I outline QRMI and a second-level scheduler for work inside HPC allocations. This improves runtime control without replacing existing schedulers.
QPUs as first-class HPC resources require software redesign. I share deployment lessons on orchestration, scheduling, and observability in production sites. This guides data-center integration decisions.
Quantum resource management interface design remains fragmented. I compare QRMI with QDMI and discuss where they should interoperate. This helps teams choose integration paths with lower lock-in.
QC-HPC systems need portable execution environments. I present architecture choices for QRMI integration, second-level scheduling, and observability. This improves usability for both developers and operators.
Quantum-HPC integration for materials science is becoming practical. Working-group talks focused on workflows, operations, and deployment constraints. This sharpens priorities for near-term application teams.
Quantum-classical supercomputing depends on operational integration. I map neutral-atom QPU infrastructure, co-processing workflows, and scheduling constraints. This clarifies what production adoption actually requires.
Heterogeneous quantum computing needs shared scheduling semantics. I cover QRMI and Slurm-based resource management across real HPC deployments. This reduces integration friction for hybrid workloads.
Quantum-HPC architecture still lacks stable handoff points. EQS3 discussions focused on abstractions and modality-specific stack choices. Clarifying these boundaries improves interoperability planning.
HPC scheduler integration for neutral-atom QPUs is still immature. Hardware-specific constraints break generic assumptions in early stack designs. Model those constraints early to avoid costly rework.
Scheduled for October 14-15, 2026 at TUM. Talk title and abstract are TBD and will be added once finalized.
Quantum software engineering often fails on product fit. I analyze why useful internal tools stay unused despite technical quality. This improves requirements, architecture choices, and long-term maintenance.
Quantum software engineering needs better language abstractions. I present Qadence as a differentiable interface for digital-analog programs. This shortens iteration loops between model design and execution.
Pulse-level simulation for neutral-atom QPUs is advancing quickly. Tensor-network methods and differentiable emulators expose limits in many advantage claims. Use simulation evidence to guide realistic roadmap choices.
Quantum-HPC ecosystem progress is visible at SC24. Booth talks and partner sessions showed where integration work is concrete versus hype. This helps prioritize engineering work with practical upside.
Neutral-atom quantum computing needs realistic framing. I explain applications, hardware constraints, and commercial timelines to an academic audience. This helps teams plan work against real delivery horizons.